Manus AI Pricing: What 4,000 Credits Buys
Manus AI pricing is $20, $40 and $200 a month for 4,000, 8,000 and 40,000 credits. Here is the per-credit math and what the ladder costs at real usage.
Table of Contents
Manus AI pricing is $20, $40 and $200 per month, for 4,000, 8,000 and 40,000 credits respectively, with annual billing marked 17% cheaper. All three tiers include 300 refresh credits every day, 20 concurrent tasks and 20 scheduled tasks.
The unusual part is what happens when you divide. The per-credit rate is almost identical across a ladder that spans 10x in price, which means Manus offers essentially no volume discount, and your bill scales linearly with how useful the tool becomes to you.
Key Takeaways:
- Manus tiers as published on August 11, 2026: $20 for 4,000 credits, $40 for 8,000, $200 for 40,000.
- The per-credit rate is flat at roughly 200 credits per dollar on every tier. Scaling up buys more, not cheaper.
- Every tier includes 300 refresh credits daily, worth roughly 9,000 a month, which is more than twice the entry tier's own monthly allowance.
- Manus does not publish credit consumption per task, stating only that it "depends on the complexity of the task."
- The $200 tier adds a "Free Cloud Computer" that the lower tiers do not include.
Manus AI Pricing at a Glance: Three Tiers, One Credit Rate
Read from the official Manus pricing page on August 11, 2026:
| Plan label | Monthly | Credits / month | Daily refresh | Concurrent tasks | Scheduled tasks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard monthly usage | $20 | 4,000 | 300 / day | 20 | 20 |
| Customizable monthly usage | $40 | 8,000 | 300 / day | 20 | 20 |
| Extended usage for productivity | $200 | 40,000 | 300 / day | 20 | 20 |
Annual billing is presented as "Annually · Save 17%."
The concurrency and scheduling limits are identical on all three. That is worth pausing on, because it means the tiers differ in one dimension only. You are not buying more parallelism or more automation slots as you go up, you are buying credits and nothing else.
If your constraint is that you want 40 scheduled jobs rather than 20, no amount of money on this page solves it.

One update from the same day: rechecking the pricing page later on 11 August 2026, the entry tier had switched to a promotional "$10 first month, then $20/month" with a 50% OFF badge. The standing rate is unchanged at $20, so every credit calculation below still holds, but the number on the card may not match what you see. This is exactly why the figures here carry a date.
What Each Manus Tier Includes Beyond the Credit Count
The feature lines differ mostly in phrasing rather than substance:
- $20: in-depth research for everyday tasks, professional websites for standard output, insightful slides for regular content, task scaling with Wide Research, early access to beta features.
- $40: in-depth research with self-set usage, professional websites for changing needs, insightful slides for steady creation, Wide Research scaled to your chosen plan, early access to beta features.
- $200: in-depth research for large-scale tasks, professional websites with data analytics, insightful slides for batch production, Wide Research for sustained heavy use, early access to beta features, and Free Cloud Computer.
Only two of those lines represent a genuine capability difference rather than a volume adjective. "Professional websites with data analytics" appears only at $200, and "Free Cloud Computer" appears only at $200.
Everything else is the same feature described at three intensities. "Regular content" versus "steady creation" versus "batch production" is copywriting, not a specification.
The Per-Credit Math: Why There Is No Volume Discount
Divide credits by dollars:
| Plan | Credits | Price | Credits per dollar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | 4,000 | $20 | 200 |
| Customizable | 8,000 | $40 | 200 |
| Extended | 40,000 | $200 | 200 |
Exactly 200 credits per dollar on every tier. This is a purely linear ladder.
Compare that to a product that does discount volume. Skywork's tiers run roughly 800, 840 and 947 credits per dollar from entry to top, an 18% improvement for scaling up. Genspark expresses its tiers in task equivalents rather than credits, which sidesteps the question differently.
Manus does neither. The consequence is straightforward and worth stating plainly: if your usage doubles, your bill doubles, forever. There is no point on the curve where growth becomes cheaper.
For occasional work that is completely fine, and arguably fairer than a ladder that punishes small users to subsidize large ones. For an automation you intend to run more often over time, it is the wrong direction, because every improvement you make to the workflow increases the invoice by the same proportion.
Manus Credit Consumption: The Number Manus Does Not Publish
The Manus plans documentation states that credits consumed per interaction "depends on the complexity of the task." There is no published rate card, no per-agent table, and no worked example.
That is defensible engineering and difficult purchasing. A credit allowance is only a budget if it converts into a count of runs, and complexity-based metering means the conversion rate is unknown until after you have spent.
The SERP for Manus pricing reflects the consequence. Two of the top ten results are Reddit threads titled around the credit system being unreasonably expensive and Manus being overpriced for what it delivers. Those threads rank because people go looking for the conversion rate, cannot find it, and end up reading other users' experiences instead of a spec.
There is one honest way through this, and it takes a week. Run your three most typical tasks. Record the credit balance before and after each. Divide. That gives you credits per task for your work, which converts every number on the pricing page into something decidable. No article, including this one, can do that step for you, because the answer is workload-specific by design.
Costing a Real Workflow Against a 4,000 Credit Month
Work the entry tier from the other direction. You have 4,000 monthly credits plus a daily refresh.
If a deep research pass costs a few hundred credits, 4,000 covers roughly ten heavy runs a month before the refresh is counted. If it costs closer to a thousand, you have four. The gap between those two scenarios is the difference between a workable subscription and a plan that runs dry in week two, and the pricing page does not tell you which world you are in.
Now overlay a schedule. A job that runs every weekday is 22 runs a month. Against 4,000 credits that is under 200 credits per run available from the monthly allowance alone. Whether that is comfortable or impossible depends entirely on the unpublished number.
This is the specific failure that sends people looking for alternatives, and it does not feel like a billing problem when it happens. It feels like a task that will not start.
We covered the free-access side of this question separately in is Manus AI free, including the fact that the pricing page currently shows no free plan card while the documentation still describes one.
The 300 Daily Refresh Credits and How They Change the Math
Every tier lists "300 refresh credits everyday." Over a 30 day month that is 9,000 credits, assuming you collect every single day.
Hold that against the tiers and the picture shifts:
| Plan | Monthly allowance | Daily refresh over 30 days | Refresh as share of total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard $20 | 4,000 | 9,000 | 69% |
| Customizable $40 | 8,000 | 9,000 | 53% |
| Extended $200 | 40,000 | 9,000 | 18% |
On the $20 tier, the daily refresh is more than twice the plan's own headline allowance. Most of what you can spend at the entry tier does not come from the thing you paid for.
That has a practical implication people miss. The refresh is daily, so it cannot be banked for a heavy week. If your work arrives in bursts, two thirds of your entry-tier capacity is only available in 300 credit slices, one day at a time. The $20 plan is therefore much better suited to steady daily use than to intermittent heavy use, regardless of the monthly total.
What Meta Ownership Means for Manus Pricing Stability
Meta acquired Manus in a deal announced in late December 2025, reported by CNBC as part of a year of aggressive AI acquisitions. The manus.im footer now reads "© 2026 Meta," and a banner across the pricing page reads "Manus is now part of Meta."
VentureBeat's analysis works through the implications for teams that had standardized on Manus.
For a pricing decision specifically, the relevant point is not that prices will rise. It is that the current structure was set by an independent company optimizing for growth, and it is now owned by one with its own distribution and its own agent strategy. Credit rates, entry tiers and bundling are all things that get revisited during integration.
If you are signing an annual plan to capture the 17% discount, you are betting on twelve months of structural stability at a moment when the parent company changed. That is a real bet, not a formality. A monthly plan costs 17% more and keeps the option open.

FAQ
How much does Manus AI cost per month?
$20 for 4,000 credits, $40 for 8,000 credits, and $200 for 40,000 credits, with annual billing marked 17% cheaper. Verified on the official pricing page August 11, 2026.
How many credits does a Manus task use?
Manus does not publish per-task consumption. Its documentation states that credits consumed depend on the complexity of the task. Measure your own tasks against your balance to get a usable figure.
Is there a Manus volume discount?
No. All three tiers work out to 200 credits per dollar, so the rate is identical from $20 to $200.
What are the 300 refresh credits?
All three paid tiers list "300 refresh credits everyday." Over 30 days that is 9,000 credits, which exceeds the $20 tier's own 4,000 monthly allowance.
What does the Manus Cloud Computer cost?
"Free Cloud Computer" is listed as a feature of the $200 Extended tier only. It does not appear on the $20 or $40 cards.
Does Manus have a free plan?
The pricing page shows three paid cards and no free card, while the documentation still describes a Free Plan with unspecified limited credits. We covered that contradiction in is Manus AI free.
Deciding Between Manus Credits and Flat-Rate Automation
Manus pricing is unusually transparent about structure and unusually opaque about outcome. You know exactly what you pay per credit, at every tier, and nothing about what a credit does.
That combination suits one pattern well: occasional heavy work, done when you ask for it, where 200 credits per dollar is a fair rate and the monthly total rarely binds. For that user the $20 tier is genuinely inexpensive.
It suits the opposite pattern badly. Scheduled work that runs whether or not you are watching gets more expensive precisely as it gets more valuable, and the daily refresh, which supplies most of the entry tier's capacity, cannot be saved up for the weeks when you need it.
Zentor is a hosted cloud AI computer billed as a flat monthly subscription rather than per credit, which is the relevant comparison for that second pattern and irrelevant for the first. We are not claiming a cost advantage without knowing your credit burn, because as this article has argued at length, nobody can know it until they measure it.
Measure first. Three typical tasks, balance before and after. Then every table above becomes a decision instead of a guess.
All pricing figures were read from manus.im on August 11, 2026. Manus is mid-integration into Meta and vendor pricing changes without notice, so re-verify before committing to an annual term.
Continue Reading
More GuideThe Zentor editorial team writes about workflow automation, AI agents, and the tools we build. Default byline for industry overviews, listicles, and collaborative pieces.
Ready to put this into practice?
MoClaw runs browser tasks, research, and schedules automatically. Try it free.
References: Manus Pricing Plans (official) · Meta acquires intelligent agent firm Manus (CNBC, Dec 30 2025) · Why Meta bought Manus and what it means for enterprise AI agents (VentureBeat) · Genspark Pricing (task-denominated comparison point) · Skywork (credits-per-dollar comparison point)